About

Location

Oxford, DIAMM


Intérêt principal (principal interest)

Ars antiqua, Ars nova, Manuscrits (paléographie)


Présentation: travaux et (ou) intérêts (Presentation: works and (or) interests)

DIAMM project Director and Manager. Medieval and Early Modern music, Dissertation on lute manuscripts 1530-1630


Site Web ?

https://www.diamm.ac.uk


Comment Wall

You need to be a member of Musicologie Médiévale to add comments!

Join Musicologie Médiévale

Comments are closed.

Comments

This reply was deleted.

Activity Feed

Michael Scott Cuthbert replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion F-Pn nouvelles acquisitions françaises 10660 in Medieval Polyphony 1440-1600
"What an amazing database, Warwick!"
Jan 11, 2023
J Craig-McFeely replied to Dominique Gatté's discussion GÖTTWEIG, Benediktinerstift Göttweig, (A-GÖ) in Répertoire des manuscrits médiévaux notés
"Thank you both for another source! I think the DIAMM database owes a great deal to the work of scholars communicating through Musicologie Médiévale, particularly Dominique, and we are all grateful that you are able to share your information with us.…"
Feb 12, 2015
J Craig-McFeely left a comment for Xavier Fresquet
"Dear Xavier,
I wonder if this job advertisement might be of interest to you?
Best wishes,
Julia

Postdoctoral Research Assistant - Linked Data and Music
Oxford e-Research Centre, Oxford
Vacancy ID :
113899

We are seeking a Research Associate…"
Jul 8, 2014
Oliver Gerlach replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"It seems that you are seriously looking for a legal advice and you will hardly be surprised not to find it here (of course, I cannot judge Gillian's advices for Julia, who knows). I am quite sure that being anachronistic had been always the main…"
Feb 6, 2014
Jason Stoessel replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Copyright protects the intellectual property rights of editors, web authors, photographers and other authors of works, or those to whom those rights are ceded. This is elementary and I would ask you to retract your statement about every published…"
Feb 5, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"The score and the music it represents are 2 different things protected by different copyrights. Lot of the music contained in the manuscripts (which is the only thing that could still be under copyright until 2039) has been subject to "issue of…"
Feb 3, 2014
Jason Stoessel replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"I can think of no medieval manuscript that was ever published as defined in Section 175 of the Act. But this is pointless since since the question concerns images and now editions.
Publications, including websites and musical editions and their…"
Feb 3, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Olivier Berten a dit :
This means indeed that out of the 5 works from DIAMM published on IMSLP (I thought there were many more, given the fuzz about it), 2 are still under copyright.






Well... actually not... It took me some more time to find…"
Feb 3, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Jason Stoessel a dit :
In fact these sections of the act are not pertinent to perpetual copyright. Instead see SCHEDULE 1, section 13(1) of the same act. Most of this music was only published IN EDITION in recent years and some remains unpublished.…"
Feb 2, 2014
Oliver Gerlach replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"I am very pleased that jurisdictional matters like copyright can provoke such an activity here. I read your opinions with great interest and it does not matter, whether I can agree or not, although I fear that Julia was right, when she wrote that it…"
Feb 2, 2014
Jason Stoessel replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Olivier Berten a dit :
Jason Stoessel a dit :
Since I have already responded to the matter of public domain in my earlier responses, I suggest a review of them will answer your questions. But I'm afraid Monsieur Berten it is not appropriate to ask a…"
Feb 2, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Jason Stoessel a dit :
Since I have already responded to the matter of public domain in my earlier responses, I suggest a review of them will answer your questions. But I'm afraid Monsieur Berten it is not appropriate to ask a complete stranger…"
Feb 2, 2014
Jason Stoessel replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Since I have already responded to the matter of public domain in my earlier responses, I suggest a review of them will answer your questions. But I'm afraid Monsieur Berten it is not appropriate to ask a complete stranger about his private…"
Feb 2, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Yves Chartier a dit :
Il n'en reste pas moins que l'attitude insolente de cet Edward Guo envers les éditeurs de musique frise l'indécence. S'il veut vraiment aider la musique contemporaine, qu'il en publie lui-même à ses propres frais dans sa propre…"
Feb 1, 2014
Yves Chartier replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"En bref:
- J'ai le droit de faire ma propre copie d'une cantate de Bach et d'en faire une édition, puisque cette oeuvre est dans le domaine public.
- J'ai le droit de numériser et de diffuser sur la Toile l'édition de cette oeuvre dans la…"
Feb 1, 2014
Olivier Berten replied to J Craig-McFeely's discussion Copyright infringement in Ars nova et Ars subtilior
"Thanks for these informations about Mr Guo. As these are rather easy to find, I guess they will take away the transparency worries of Mr Stoessel (mine are still there about his transparency about the legal informations he got on Public Domain…"
Feb 1, 2014
More…